I don’t eat much cake, but a single slice package at the grocer caught my eye. That started a trip down memory lane into the ‘60s and that meandered into a recent case study of how one company beat Google at its own game. Walk with me a moment and I’ll show you how a sweet tooth led me to question what I would do for money.
Dessert
Ever heard of Sock it to Me Cake? Me either, but it’s good. I’d call it Spice Cake Gone Wild. When I put that remark on Facebook, a friend asked where I found it. Another buddy beat me to the punch line and replied that they served it at Laugh-In Market.
I was a little girl when Rowan and Martin’s show was on the air. I giggled at the slapstick, but didn’t really appreciate the controversial topics they constantly satirized that gave network censors and executives ulcers. But, when I recently saw a PBS show on it, I was dumbfounded at how topical and relevant those skits still were today.
The Law
I was in grade school when busing and integration hit our little town. My brother served in Vietnam. I was in a big city when the AIDS crisis first hit. A mixed race couple bought my first house, much to the dismay of one neighbor who lamented how multi-cultural her once all-white neighborhood was becoming.
Those were akin to the types of controversial topics Laugh-In took on and all I could think while watching the clips was that it has taken passing laws to make many folks wake up to the fact that humans are some of the most inhumane creatures on the planet.
When do we get to the point that we internalize that we can’t lie, mistreat, and steal our way to happiness?
Search Engines
Thinking about personal ethics led me to recall a case study I read about an SEO (Search Engine Optimization) firm that figured out how to make a junk site worth millions. Over the past year Google has been implementing algorithms to make what displays in your search results more relevant and of high value. To do that, they need to penalize junk sites that are just luring you in with great headlines and keywords so you’ll click on their ads.
The case study showed the black-hat practices used to get their site ranked high in six month, which made the domain worth $43 million. Yep, you read that right. Of course, the only reason these methods came to light was to point out what not to do because that site had been penalized by Google and taken out of the search engine, so now the domain was worth nearly nothing.
Drawing Conclusions
While I was finishing off the last bite of cake, I got to thinking about that SEO firm and their unethical behavior. Then I got to thinking about Google itself. I mean, who are they, the Internet police? They claim to be making search better for us but what they’re really doing is attempting to eliminate the junk sites so that quality sites with Google Ads come to the top.
And what about that SEO firm? What did they do that was so bad? They didn’t lose other people’s money. They lost their own. That sounds more like Vegas than Wall Street. And, what they really lost was the time and effort. Domain names and hosting are cheap, and they certainly didn’t pay a staff to write quality content; just a few folks to get backlinks. Don’t think for a minute they laid off those folks either. They’ve probably got 1000 domain names they’re doing much the same with.
Bottom line, no one was harmed and no laws were broken. In fact, there aren’t any laws about that sort of thing. Google is not the law. After all, there is always Bing and not many SEO firms are trying to game them yet.
I use white-hat SEO practices on all my sites and I’m eking out a living. I’ve walked away from six figure job offers that wanted to do the same thing for their clients that the SEO firm did for themselves. Now I bet those client sites have been dropped from Google too if they went through with it.
Things that Make You Go Hmm
That $43 mil figure haunts me. The SEO firm didn’t spend more than 10 minutes doing what takes me hours every week, like writing quality content that helps folks, or commenting on a social media post from a colleague. SEO stuff is all just a game when you get into the big league. It’s rather cloak and dagger, cat and mouse play. There’s a lot of money at stake. I would imagine it’s more than the casinos rake in each day but less than Wall Street.
Yeah, I could live on that. But, could I shift my mind and my ethics to earn it? Could you? I suppose I could for a junk site, but not one I care about sustaining. Maybe that’s the rub.
The fact is black hat SEO practices are bad for sites that want to sustain a business presence online. But what if you just want to flip a domain? Is it like flipping a house? You put sweat equity into it but you never live there. It’s never your home and it was never meant to be. But, for who moves in next, it is home. Do they have to do a cleansing to get rid of the vibe that made it worth having?
I don’t sit well with folks that make promises and take money then deliver shoddy work or worse, just flat rip people off. I’m trying to figure out how the SEO firm is truly unethical in what they did. Maybe I could see it if I weren’t peering through a $43 million dollar haze.






